News - Lenders
Mortgage Solutions | 20 Feb 2012 | 10:30
Abbey for Intermediaries confirmed any customers with all or part of an existing loan in interest-only with Abbey for Intermediaries (AFI) may be able to take the loan with them to another property.
However, customers can only go direct to branches to agree these deals so no procuration fee will be available to brokers in these cases.
The conditions attached allowing customers to port include taking on another new mortgage on an interest-only basis, total borrowing at no higher than 75% and if the customer is borrowing the same mortgage amount or less.
However, where a customer wishes to port their existing product(s) and borrow more on their new property and the new LTV is over 50%, applications can be processed in the normal way if the loan is capital and interest. If so, brokers receive a proc fee on the total mortgage loan as usual.
This follows Abbey's announcement on the 8 February it planned to drop the maximum LTV on its interest-only deals from 75% to 50%. The broker note which went out this morning further clarified these changes.
Lloyds followed shortly after that last Thursday with plans to restrict its own interest-only criteria.
An AFI spokesperson said: "Today's note just confirms that for existing interest-only customers who are seeking like for like porting, where they wish to borrow the same amount or less, they would be able to port on interest-only up to 75 per cent LTV. Our usual porting criteria would apply.
"Any change to a customer's mortgage will be assessed in line with our lending criteria at that time," she added.
Ray Boulger, senior technical director at Charcol said it's hard to find a reason behind Abbey's decision not to pay a broker proc fee on these remortgage deals.
"If this is an incentive to brokers to encourage clients on to capital and repayment loan, any decent broker should be doing this anyway if appropriate. But by choosing to remove the proc fee from the deal, this could even incentivise a broker to give the wrong advice. Abbey could pay a proc fee if it wanted to. It is just choosing not to."
Andrew Montlake, communications director at Coreco said this is a bit of a slap in the face for brokers.
"I suspect that when a client wants to port interest-only, they're going to need advice more than usual given the changing times and reducing interest-only lender options."
Borowers may want to move to a part-repayment, part-interest-only deal so talking to a broker could also help lenders reduce their risk profiles, he said.
"Everyone understands why lenders are making these changes and no lender wants to be the last man standing offering interest-only. But a lot of lenders are over-correcting, fearful of being sued in the future," added Montlake.
Meanwhile, Santander was hit with a fine of £1.5m this morning for failing to clarify the terms under which some of its structured investment products are covered under the Financial Services Compensation scheme.
Latest jobs
Job of the week
Audio/Video
Reasons to be Cheerful
It's not all doom and gloom in the mortgage market, so click here for a dose of cheer.
Updating your subscription status
Other services
Coffee Lounge
Not only is there a huge selection of games but why not try your hand at our Daily Sudoku, have a laugh at our industry cartoon or take a psychometric test!
Recent comments
Another example of crisis management from Santander. Doesnt anybody within this company actually think about the consequences of knee-jerk decisions. A like for like port or a reduction in borrowing is not that common for brokers and therefore this further attack on intermediries shouldnt affect us too much. "Abbey for intermediaries" dont make me laugh!!!!
Pointed
20 Feb 2012 | 11:06
Complain about this comment
I find it, shall we say disappointing, that Abbey is being selective at what it will allow brokers to submit. What possible reason, other than to avoid paying some proc fees, is there to restrict submission of porting cases? It's a bit like the change Santander introduced in preventing A&L borrowers from porting via brokers. I think AFI needs renaming. How about SFI-Shabbey for Intermediaries?
Graham Griffin
20 Feb 2012 | 11:23
Complain about this comment