You are here: Home - News -

City watchdog consults on unfair mid-contract changes

by: Paloma Kubiak
  • 17/05/2018
  • 0
The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has proposed guidelines firms should follow when drafting and reviewing contracts - particularly when varying terms - to ensure consumers are treated fairly.

 

Under the Consumer Rights Act 2015, the terms of firms’ contracts must be fair and transparent. Where the FCA considers changes to clauses in a contract to be unfair or lacking in transparency, it can take action.

While this area is not new, the regulator’s proposals are a step in clarifying and standardising previous guidance and also reflects current legislation and case law.

The FCA has set out the following guidance for financial services firms in relation to the fairness of variation in terms, usually found in contracts with a long or indeterminate duration, including current accounts, personal pensions, mortgage or credit card agreements:

  • The validity of the reason(s) for varying a term;
  • The transparency of the variation term;
  • Provision for notice in the variation term;
  • Give consumers the freedom to exit a contract if they do not want to accept the variation.

 

Risks consumer harm

Consultation documents stated: “We want to make our view clear on the appropriate way to assess the fairness of variation terms.

“We acknowledge the benefit of fair variation terms to firms and consumers, because they allow contracts to be changed in their lifetime, making them more available to consumers.

“For example, the scope to change variable rate contracts allows firms to offer competitively-priced products that go beyond ones that track base rate, therefore offering greater choice to consumers.

“This is because firms know they may vary the interest rates they charge to reflect changes in circumstances, particularly changes in firms’ own costs of funding. However, appropriate drafting is required as an unfair variation term is not binding on the consumer and also risks causing consumer harm through unfair use.”

The consultation is open until 7 September.

There are 0 Comment(s)

You may also be interested in

Business Skills

In this section, we offer short ‘how to’ guides on harder to crack areas of business. From social media, to regulation or niche product areas, we cover it all.

Profiles

Our journalists interview key industry entrepreneurs, strategists and commentators for day-to-day market insight and a strategic view of where the industry is heading. We offer lessons for success and explore the opportunities for your business

Success in Practice

Here, we share case studies fleshing out best practice to help you decide what could work for your business. Take a look at how others approached complex tasks like launching a new mortgage lender, advising on a new product area or deciding to specialise in another. Learn from others mistakes and triumphs.

Marketwatch

Each week, we ask top mortgage and property commentators with a unique perspective to examine a key news headline, market move or regulatory or political issue.

Poll

Vote in our weekly poll here. It’s your chance to tell us what you think and be heard on the top news stories of the week. Review our archive to find out what your industry really thinks and all our coverage of the results.

Top Comments

Be part of the conversation on Mortgage Solutions. We want to hear from you. We have a tool called Disqus to tell us which stories get the most comments each week. Every Friday, the team picks the most thoughtful or opinionated contributions from our readers to enjoy again. Don’t forget to share your favourite stories from the site on social media to keep the conversation going.
Read previous post:
mobile phone complaints
Ombudsman issues £1.3m in redress for property complaints

The Property Ombudsman revealed it dealt with more than 3,000 sales and lettings complaints in 2017, with consumers receiving £1.36m...

Close