You are here: Home - News -

AIFA publishes response to CP121 and mortgage regulation papers

  • 21/05/2002
  • 0
The Association of Independent Financial Advisers (AIFA) has published its response to the Financial...

The Association of Independent Financial Advisers (AIFA) has published its response to the Financial Services Authority’s (FSA) CP121 paper and the Treasury consultation paper on mortgage regulation.

On CP121, AIFA thinks polarisation reform will distort competition, if it results in fewer independent advisers.

It points out that the direct retail sector needs competition from an independent sector, which allows new providers to enter markets without the need to build up a controlled distribution arm. New providers tend to drive market innovation, and if distribution is controlled by a few providers then competitive pressure will fall.

Paul Smee, director general of AIFA, said: ‘We believe the FSA’s proposals would bring competitive distortions into the market if, as we believe, there is substantial contraction in the independent sector following the introduction of the proposed defined payment system (DPS). The DPS needs to be modified and there should be equivalent rules in place for all types of distribution.’

The response notes there is no proposal for a specific form for DPS and, in this case, it would be difficult for clients to compare costs by shopping around.

DPS proposes an independent adviser under the proposed regime would have to negotiate up-front service charges and the collection method ‘ either fees, commission, or both. If there is commission which is more than the fee, then it must be used to benefit the client.

Although mortgage advice is not the core business of most members, AIFA is interested in mortgage regulation as it expects principles adopted by the market’s regulators to be used in the general IFA market and vice versa.

Following the Council of Mortgage Lenders’ line, AIFA said the £5 maximum fee for mortgage transactions that do not complete bears no relationship to the work done, and, if mortgages were brought in line with other regulated products, then the limit would be removed. Disclosure rules, in place for other products, would ensure consumers are aware of the cost of advice.


There are 0 Comment(s)

You may also be interested in

Business Skills

In this section, we offer short ‘how to’ guides on harder to crack areas of business. From social media, to regulation or niche product areas, we cover it all.


Our journalists interview key industry entrepreneurs, strategists and commentators for day-to-day market insight and a strategic view of where the industry is heading. We offer lessons for success and explore the opportunities for your business

Success in Practice

Here, we share case studies fleshing out best practice to help you decide what could work for your business. Take a look at how others approached complex tasks like launching a new mortgage lender, advising on a new product area or deciding to specialise in another. Learn from others mistakes and triumphs.


Each week, we ask top mortgage and property commentators with a unique perspective to examine a key news headline, market move or regulatory or political issue.


Vote in our weekly poll here. It’s your chance to tell us what you think and be heard on the top news stories of the week. Review our archive to find out what your industry really thinks and all our coverage of the results.

Top Comments

Be part of the conversation on Mortgage Solutions. We want to hear from you. We have a tool called Disqus to tell us which stories get the most comments each week. Every Friday, the team picks the most thoughtful or opinionated contributions from our readers to enjoy again. Don’t forget to share your favourite stories from the site on social media to keep the conversation going.

Read previous post:
Paymentshield takes to the road with shows

Paymentshield is hosting a series of 14 roadshows aimed at mortgage brokers and IFAs. Starting on 15...