You are here: Home - News -

Former adviser banned for lying about professional credentials

by: IFAonline
  • 30/01/2014
  • 0
Former adviser banned for lying about professional credentials
A former investment adviser has been fined £19,900 and banned by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) after it was discovered he had fabricated Statements of Professional Standing.

The regulator determined Ewan King is not a fit and proper person, lacking honesty and integrity, and poses a risk to consumers and to confidence in the financial system.

SPSs prove that an adviser is qualified to the minimum standard put in place by the Retail Distribution Review (RDR).

King is the first adviser to be banned by the FCA for fabricating these Statements.

Tracey McDermott, director of enforcement and financial crime at the FCA, said: “Pushing up professional standards was a key objective of the RDR. Thousands of advisers have met those standards. Mr King failed not only to achieve the qualifications required by RDR but then acted dishonestly and continued advising customers.

“His conduct fell woefully short of the standard that we, and consumers, demand of those who work in the financial services industry.”

King was an appointed representative, which meant that he had a contract with a principal firm allowing him to perform certain activities regulated by the FCA.

In early 2013, King led this firm to believe that he held a Statement of Professional Standing issued by the Chartered Insurance Institute (CII), one of the bodies accredited by the FCA to verify that advisers are qualified to the right level. When challenged to produce his Statement, King sent two fabricated documents.

The FCA later checked the validity of Mr King’s Statements to be told by the CII that Mr King had not applied for, or been issued with, a Statement because he had not reached the right level of qualification. Mr King later admitted to his principal firm that he had failed the relevant exams and his contract was subsequently terminated.

The FCA has made no findings against Mr King’s former principal firm.

Mr King agreed to settle at an early stage of the FCA’s case and so qualified for a 30% discount. Were it not for this discount, the FCA would have imposed a financial penalty of £25,734.

There are 0 Comment(s)

You may also be interested in