You are here: Home - News -

Budget clause on sub-letting worries landlords

by: Emma Lunn
  • 26/03/2015
  • 0
Budget clause on sub-letting worries landlords
Landlords are up in arms about Budget small print which will allow private rented sector tenants greater freedom to sub-let.

On page 51 of the Budget Red Book, a document that is published on the same day as the Budget, is a section entitled “support for the sharing economy”.

The clause said the government will: “Make it easier for individuals to sub-let a room through its intention to legislate to prevent the use of clauses in private fixed-term residential tenancy agreements that expressly rule out subletting or otherwise sharing space on a short-term basis, and consider extending this prohibition to statutory periodic tenancies.”

The government hasn’t given any further details about the proposal which could mean anything from letting spare rooms in rental property via websites such as Airbnb to giving tenants the power to sub-let entire properties to third parties.

Residential Landlords Association (RLA) chairman Alan Ward described the move as a “nightmare in the making” and said it smacked of “back of the fag packet” policy making.

“Key questions remained unanswered such as who will be responsible for a property if the tenant sub-letting leaves the house but the tenant they are subletting to stays?” he said. “Similarly, given the government wants landlords to check the immigration status of their tenants, who would be responsible for checking the status where subletting occurs?”

Eviction specialist firm Landlord Action said the move would be “catastrophic for the rental industry”. Founder Paul Shamplina has repeatedly warned about the increase in subletting scams in the private rented sector, especially in London.

“We have never seen so many subletting cases going to court because of unscrupulous tenants trying to cream a profit from a property they have rented,” he said.

“We experience continual problems with tenants taking out tenancy agreements and then, in some instances, not even moving into the property themselves, but putting up partitions and subletting to as many people as possible. They draw up separate agreements and trick sub-tenants into thinking they are the landlord. By the time landlords find out, damage to properties from over-crowding can run into thousands, and the tenant who holds the legitimate tenancy agreement is nowhere to be found.”

Sub-letting also throws up problems from an insurance point of view. Pricing for landlord insurance policies is based on the tenant type, among other factors, with insurers attributing higher risk for certain types of tenant.

“It will be difficult for a landlord to disclose the details of their tenants, and answer the risk question accurately if they no longer have the final say on who occupies their property” said Steve Jones, director of Rentguard Insurance.  

“The real problem would come if underwriters decide to charge the higher rate to everyone to factor in the likelihood of damage cause by tenant’s sub-letting the property.”

Problems may also arise as tenants are unlikely to professionally reference those they sublet to and may as a result know very little about them, their lifestyle, background and ability to regularly pay the rent.

“It remains to be seen if the government will rethink this move after the backlash it has faced from the private rented sector, as at the moment it is hard to see who this new ruling benefits – other than tenants looking to rip off hard working landlords,” said Jones.


There are 0 Comment(s)

You may also be interested in

Read previous post:
MAB grows individual adviser numbers by 22% – results

Mortgage Advice Bureau (MAB) increased the number of its individual advisers by 22% last year from 521 in 2013 to...