You are here: Home - News -

The case for compliance

  • 01/07/2003
  • 0
The news that compliance costs are increasing for those already operating under the auspices of...

The news that compliance costs are increasing for those already operating under the auspices of Financial Services Authority (FSA) will come as no surprise to those who have been following the proposals for statutory mortgage regulation.

But while any cost increases caused by regulation are cause for concern, the news was tempered by the fact that a proportion of the increases has been attributed to one-off costs associated with moving to the new regulatory system. Indeed, few would actually complain if increased compliance costs brought in more professionalism and helped change outdated public perception of the financial advice industry. Again, if increased costs mean that the number of firms who, by their actions (intentional or otherwise), act in a manner which causes consumers to lose faith with financial services actually falls then it can only be a good thing.

It is too late for Pure Protection Network, which has just been put into liquidation despite its claim to be ‘the fastest growing non-regulated protection network in the UK’.

However, the news that the Treasury is to investigate whether to include home reversion schemes under the FSA’s remit and that the FSA is considering setting further exams for those intermediaries who want to advise on lifetime mortgages is an opportunity that many advisers will welcome. Selling equity release products will not appeal to every adviser as it can be a difficult and time-consuming sale, but for those who do, being able to show clients that you are taking the sale of financial products very seriously will be of immense benefit to individual firms and the industry as a whole.

The key issue is to ensure that the costs and requirements under regulation are balanced and actually engender the idea that financial intermediaries are skilled professionals. As usual the only way to ensure this happens is to respond to the FSA’s consultation papers.

Ben Marquand, editor


There are 0 Comment(s)

You may also be interested in

Business Skills

In this section, we offer short ‘how to’ guides on harder to crack areas of business. From social media, to regulation or niche product areas, we cover it all.


Our journalists interview key industry entrepreneurs, strategists and commentators for day-to-day market insight and a strategic view of where the industry is heading. We offer lessons for success and explore the opportunities for your business

Success in Practice

Here, we share case studies fleshing out best practice to help you decide what could work for your business. Take a look at how others approached complex tasks like launching a new mortgage lender, advising on a new product area or deciding to specialise in another. Learn from others mistakes and triumphs.


Each week, we ask top mortgage and property commentators with a unique perspective to examine a key news headline, market move or regulatory or political issue.


Vote in our weekly poll here. It’s your chance to tell us what you think and be heard on the top news stories of the week. Review our archive to find out what your industry really thinks and all our coverage of the results.

Top Comments

Be part of the conversation on Mortgage Solutions. We want to hear from you. We have a tool called Disqus to tell us which stories get the most comments each week. Every Friday, the team picks the most thoughtful or opinionated contributions from our readers to enjoy again. Don’t forget to share your favourite stories from the site on social media to keep the conversation going.
  • RT @Official_AMI: We raised an amazing £3,536.40 for @MytonHospices last night so a huge thank you to everyone who donated. This is the hig…
Read previous post:
Hamptons boosts lending volume

Hamptons International Mortgages is bringing forward its expansion plans in a bid to radically incre...