You are here: Home - News -

Industry backs CML’s tentative welcome to the Treasury’s consultation paper

by:
  • 08/05/2002
  • 0
The mortgage industry has issued its responses to the Treasury consultation document, Regulating Mor...

The mortgage industry has issued its responses to the Treasury consultation document, Regulating Mortgages, with many backing the Council of Mortgage Lenders’ (CML) response to the paper. The CML has welcomed the proposed regulation, but wants to ensure it is cost-effective and proportionate.

In its response, Norwich & Peterborough’s general manager, Stephen Penlington, said: ‘We broadly endorse the CML’s response. It is vital all mortgage-related legislation works in harmony without so-called regulatory gaps. Lenders need a clear framework in which to conduct their business. The Financial Services Authority (FSA) must publish its final rules as early as possible to allow lenders the maximum window in which to implement the significant system and business changes this legislation represents.

‘It will be helpful to lenders if the FSA can provide certainty of detail in those areas already consulted upon that are unlikely to change, following its next detailed consultation paper.’

Charcol has said it wants to see a correlation between CP121 and the consultation paper.

Ray Boulger, senior technical manager at Charcol, said: ‘The final response on CP121 will affect the regulation of mortgages and so there is a need to tie in the timetable of regulation with polarisation. The definitions of polarisation need to be clarified, as this will impact how people describe themselves on the mortgage side.’

Jonathan Taylor, head of lending development at Abbey National, also believes clarification needs to added to the industry: ‘There is some confusion over the distinction between a tied agent and an appointed representative, and we wonder if there is a mistake in the consultation paper. We have asked for clarification on this point.’

Abbey has also asked the Treasury to ensure at least 12 months is written into the process, to allow time for systems development work to be completed ‘ another proposal issued by the CML.

However, Nick Baxter, director of Mortgage Promotions, believes many have focused on the finer details of the paper, but failed to consider the cost of regulation.

He said: ‘Everyone is looking at the details, but not considering the cost. The Treasury is anticipating a £32m re-occurring cost and a £36m one-off cost. Costs will rocket for brokers under the new regime and smaller brokers need to consider this.’


Tags

There are 0 Comment(s)

You may also be interested in

Business Skills

In this section, we offer short ‘how to’ guides on harder to crack areas of business. From social media, to regulation or niche product areas, we cover it all.

Profiles

Our journalists interview key industry entrepreneurs, strategists and commentators for day-to-day market insight and a strategic view of where the industry is heading. We offer lessons for success and explore the opportunities for your business

Success in Practice

Here, we share case studies fleshing out best practice to help you decide what could work for your business. Take a look at how others approached complex tasks like launching a new mortgage lender, advising on a new product area or deciding to specialise in another. Learn from others mistakes and triumphs.

Marketwatch

Each week, we ask top mortgage and property commentators with a unique perspective to examine a key news headline, market move or regulatory or political issue.

Poll

Vote in our weekly poll here. It’s your chance to tell us what you think and be heard on the top news stories of the week. Review our archive to find out what your industry really thinks and all our coverage of the results.

Top Comments

Be part of the conversation on Mortgage Solutions. We want to hear from you. We have a tool called Disqus to tell us which stories get the most comments each week. Every Friday, the team picks the most thoughtful or opinionated contributions from our readers to enjoy again. Don’t forget to share your favourite stories from the site on social media to keep the conversation going.
Read previous post:
FSA fines firm £140k over compliance failure

An adviser firm has been fined £140,000 by the Financial Services Authority (FSA) for compliance fai...

Close