You are here: Home - News -

Market acts to clarify through and correspondent lending

by:
  • 01/07/2002
  • 0
Confusion among brokers about the difference between correspondent and through lending has prompted ...

Confusion among brokers about the difference between correspondent and through lending has prompted key players to discuss the development of new definitions to clarify the processes.

Representatives from correspondent lenders, including GMAC-RFC, Platform Home Loans, Mortgages plc, Preferred Mortgages and SPML, debated the issue at a recent meeting organised by National Guarantee. A unanimous decision was made, establishing the first industry-wide definitions for the different sectors.

Peter Beaumont, sales and marketing director at Mortgages plc, said due to forthcoming regulation, the sectors will need to become more transparent and the definitions worked towards this goal.

‘Lenders use different terms to describe correspondent lending, such as branded correspondent lending or true correspondent lending. This means brokers, who have seen new lenders entering the market, have not understood who they are dealing with. A major issue going forward is transparency. Clarifying the definitions is a step towards this,’ he said.

Keith Robinson, managing director of National Guarantee, said agree-ing what constitutes correspondent lending is a major milestone for the specialist mortgage industry.

‘With a common ground between the sector’s major players, we hope to bring a greater understanding of the precise benefits of correspondent lending and through lending to intermediaries and their clients,’ he said.

definitions

The definitions to clarify through lending and corresponding lending are:

• Correspondent lending: the term to be used going forward when describing a relationship between lenders and third parties (typically large packagers) who are marketing themselves as correspondents and rely on third parties to provide funding lines.

• Through lending: the definition to be used when describing a relationship between two lenders, whereby one organisation uses its own capital to lend money to the public and then sells on the loan to a third party.

Tags

There are 0 Comment(s)

You may also be interested in

Business Skills

In this section, we offer short ‘how to’ guides on harder to crack areas of business. From social media, to regulation or niche product areas, we cover it all.

Profiles

Our journalists interview key industry entrepreneurs, strategists and commentators for day-to-day market insight and a strategic view of where the industry is heading. We offer lessons for success and explore the opportunities for your business

Success in Practice

Here, we share case studies fleshing out best practice to help you decide what could work for your business. Take a look at how others approached complex tasks like launching a new mortgage lender, advising on a new product area or deciding to specialise in another. Learn from others mistakes and triumphs.

Marketwatch

Each week, we ask top mortgage and property commentators with a unique perspective to examine a key news headline, market move or regulatory or political issue.

Poll

Vote in our weekly poll here. It’s your chance to tell us what you think and be heard on the top news stories of the week. Review our archive to find out what your industry really thinks and all our coverage of the results.

Top Comments

Be part of the conversation on Mortgage Solutions. We want to hear from you. We have a tool called Disqus to tell us which stories get the most comments each week. Every Friday, the team picks the most thoughtful or opinionated contributions from our readers to enjoy again. Don’t forget to share your favourite stories from the site on social media to keep the conversation going.
Read previous post:
LENDER VIEW

The Intermediary Mortgage Lenders Association (IMLA) represents the views of some 25 UK lenders invo...

Close