You are here: Home - News -

My client is a first-time buyer and wants to take out a joint mortgage with her parents in order to increase her income multiples. Would there be any capital gains tax implications?

  • 14/03/2002
  • 0
It is becoming more common for multiple parties to buy a property. This is often done for sensible r...

It is becoming more common for multiple parties to buy a property. This is often done for sensible reasons, for example a sitting tenant who cannot afford the mortgage repayments on their own, but could with their children. The scenario you give is a perfect example of when the purchase by a child with the help of parents could be the right thing to do.

There are always pros and cons. Anyone who puts their name on the title to a property, and perhaps more significantly a mortgage, has to accept the responsibility that carries. From the property point of view, it means the responsibility to third parties as an owner and from the mortgage point of view it means they are responsible for the repayments in the event of a default by the other party.

The lender will see all parties as jointly responsible and would not be interested in apportioning repayments in the event of any problems. One of the main questions to ask with multiple-owned properties is: what are the tax implications on sale?

Assuming the parents do not live there, there could be a problem as there is an exemption for capital gains tax (CGT) only if a property is the principal or main residence of the taxpayer. If your client’s parents therefore have their own property, any gain in their interest in the value of their jointly-owned property with their daughter could be brought into account. This is definitely one to watch and advice is essential.

One solution, of course, would be for the parents to guarantee the mortgage, rather than be a party to the mortgage itself.

If that was acceptable to the lender, their names would not go on the title to the property and therefore any gain in the value would be fully exempt as the property would only be in the name of the daughter.

Edward Goldsmith


There are 0 Comment(s)

You may also be interested in

Business Skills

In this section, we offer short ‘how to’ guides on harder to crack areas of business. From social media, to regulation or niche product areas, we cover it all.


Our journalists interview key industry entrepreneurs, strategists and commentators for day-to-day market insight and a strategic view of where the industry is heading. We offer lessons for success and explore the opportunities for your business

Success in Practice

Here, we share case studies fleshing out best practice to help you decide what could work for your business. Take a look at how others approached complex tasks like launching a new mortgage lender, advising on a new product area or deciding to specialise in another. Learn from others mistakes and triumphs.


Each week, we ask top mortgage and property commentators with a unique perspective to examine a key news headline, market move or regulatory or political issue.


Vote in our weekly poll here. It’s your chance to tell us what you think and be heard on the top news stories of the week. Review our archive to find out what your industry really thinks and all our coverage of the results.

Top Comments

Be part of the conversation on Mortgage Solutions. We want to hear from you. We have a tool called Disqus to tell us which stories get the most comments each week. Every Friday, the team picks the most thoughtful or opinionated contributions from our readers to enjoy again. Don’t forget to share your favourite stories from the site on social media to keep the conversation going.
  • RT @robjupp: Great day yesterday for donations to @MortSleepOut. With Gift Aid, we are now close to £17,000. It would be great to get to £2…

Read previous post:
As easy as…

With so much jargon used in the non-conforming market, brokers will need to give borrowers guidance to help them through...