You are here: Home - News -

Letting agent fee transparency rules have failed, warns ARLA Propertymark

  • 31/05/2017
  • 0
Letting agent fee transparency rules have failed, warns ARLA Propertymark
The Association of Residential Letting Agents (ARLA Propertymark) has slammed the government’s previous attempts to improve transparency surrounding fees, arguing that the level of enforcement has been “woefully inadequate”.

The trade body, responding to the government’s latest consultation on its plan to ban letting agents from charging fees to tenants, said that the transparency measures introduced in 2015 had made little difference to standards or to improve competition.

It said that while the government had issued guidance to local authorities on how to comply with the new rules, no guidance on how to comply had been sent to letting agents. In addition, there has been almost no enforcement of the rules according to ARLA Propertymark, which noted that of the 32 London boroughs, only four had actually undertaken any prosecutions.

It concluded: “The level of enforcement across all aspects of landlord and tenant law is woefully inadequate. Until this issue is addressed and existing laws are properly enforced, we do not believe that new laws should be introduced as the result will be history repeating itself over again – professional landlords and agents will comply and the criminal element will continue operating under the radar.”

ARLA Propertymark also took aim at the proposal to ban letting agent fees, accepting that it was the “will of the government” but flagging up a host of issues with the idea and calling for certain exemptions. These include the ability to charge for referencing.

It said: “With such a chronic shortage of rental housing, allowing an exemption to the ban on letting fees for tenant referencing will make securing a rental home easier for those on low incomes or those who have a poor credit rating. By exempting referencing, agents will be able to maintain their current referencing services and will not be forced to take shortcuts or take the tenant who appears to be most likely to be able to pay the rent and most unlikely to require follow up Right to Rent checks.”

There are 0 Comment(s)

You may also be interested in

Business Skills

In this section, we offer short ‘how to’ guides on harder to crack areas of business. From social media, to regulation or niche product areas, we cover it all.


Our journalists interview key industry entrepreneurs, strategists and commentators for day-to-day market insight and a strategic view of where the industry is heading. We offer lessons for success and explore the opportunities for your business

Success in Practice

Here, we share case studies fleshing out best practice to help you decide what could work for your business. Take a look at how others approached complex tasks like launching a new mortgage lender, advising on a new product area or deciding to specialise in another. Learn from others mistakes and triumphs.


Each week, we ask top mortgage and property commentators with a unique perspective to examine a key news headline, market move or regulatory or political issue.


Vote in our weekly poll here. It’s your chance to tell us what you think and be heard on the top news stories of the week. Review our archive to find out what your industry really thinks and all our coverage of the results.

Top Comments

Be part of the conversation on Mortgage Solutions. We want to hear from you. We have a tool called Disqus to tell us which stories get the most comments each week. Every Friday, the team picks the most thoughtful or opinionated contributions from our readers to enjoy again. Don’t forget to share your favourite stories from the site on social media to keep the conversation going.

Read previous post:
County Tyrone man loses repossession fight with BoS over interest-only mortgage

A County Tyrone man who is fighting a repossession order from Bank of Scotland has lost his appeal to keep...