You are here: Home - News -

FCA considers allowing consumers to pursue breach of principles claims in court

by:
  • 17/07/2018
  • 0
FCA considers allowing consumers to pursue breach of principles claims in court
The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) is considering allowing consumers to seek damages from firms in court if they break the regulatory principles of treating customers fairly.

 

The regulator raised the subject as part of its Duty of Care discussion paper, which is reviewing whether to amend any of its duty of care requirements, or overhaul it completely and introduce a New Duty or alternative approaches.

It said that Duty of care refers, broadly, to a legal obligation to take care which, when breached, will make the person at fault liable to compensate the victim for the loss they have suffered.

As part of the discussion, the FCA said that at present consumers were not able to claim when firms breached its principles and that it could not impose a consumer redress scheme for such a breach.

Question four in the paper asks: Should the FCA reconsider whether breaches of the Principles should give rise to a private right for damages in court? Or should breaching a New Duty give this right?

The FCA noted that the original rationale against allowing a claim was that “the risk of civil litigation driving the interpretation and application of the principles outweighed the benefit to consumers of being able to take action against firms, given that consumers can take action in respect of other, more specific rules”.

It added: “Nevertheless, it is open to the FCA to re-visit this issue and consider again what the potential benefit and detriment would be of making breaches of the principles actionable by private persons.”

The Law Society considered the issue in 2014 and rejected it, stating it was likely to result in defensive rather than beneficial behaviour and that it was “extremely controversial, with most financial intermediaries opposed to the change.”

However, it doing so would underline the importance of acting in the best interests of clients.

 

The five questions in the paper are:

Question 1

Do you believe there is a gap in the FCA’s existing regulatory framework that could be addressed by introducing a New Duty, whether through a duty of care or other change(s)?
If you believe that there is, please explain what change(s) you want to see. We are particularly interested in your views on:

  1. The types of harm and/or misconduct any changes would address.
  2. Whether a New Duty should be introduced and, if so, what form it should take.
  3. What additional consumer protection and benefit this would provide, above the current regime (including over and above the existing implied term in the CRA for reasonable care and skill).
  4. How a New Duty could and should act to mitigate or remove conflicts of interest, including the types of conflicts which exist in the provision of financial services?
  5. Whether a New Duty could reduce complexity and bring greater clarity, or whether it could result in an additional layer of regulation and make it more complex, and, if so, how?
  6. Whether other alternatives could help address any gaps, for example, extending the clients’ best interests rule to different activities.
  7. Whether we should introduce more detailed rules and guidance, and, if so, what specific rules and guidance are required?
  8. Whether the scope of any changes should differ between markets and whether it should include wholesale transactions.

 

Question 2

What might a New Duty for firms in financial services do to enhance positive behaviour and conduct from firms in the financial services market, and incentivise good consumer outcomes?

 

Question 3

How would a New Duty increase our effectiveness in preventing and tackling harm and achieving good outcomes for consumers? Do you believe that the way we regulate results in a gap that a New Duty would address?

 

Question 4

Should the FCA reconsider whether breaches of the Principles should give rise to a private right for damages in court? Or should breaching a New Duty give this right?

 

Question 5

Do you believe that a New Duty would be more effective in preventing harm and would therefore mean that redress would need to be relied on less? If so, please set out the ways in which a New Duty would improve the current regime.

 

 

There are 0 Comment(s)

You may also be interested in

Business Skills

In this section, we offer short ‘how to’ guides on harder to crack areas of business. From social media, to regulation or niche product areas, we cover it all.

Profiles

Our journalists interview key industry entrepreneurs, strategists and commentators for day-to-day market insight and a strategic view of where the industry is heading. We offer lessons for success and explore the opportunities for your business

Success in Practice

Here, we share case studies fleshing out best practice to help you decide what could work for your business. Take a look at how others approached complex tasks like launching a new mortgage lender, advising on a new product area or deciding to specialise in another. Learn from others mistakes and triumphs.

Marketwatch

Each week, we ask top mortgage and property commentators with a unique perspective to examine a key news headline, market move or regulatory or political issue.

Poll

Vote in our weekly poll here. It’s your chance to tell us what you think and be heard on the top news stories of the week. Review our archive to find out what your industry really thinks and all our coverage of the results.

Top Comments

Be part of the conversation on Mortgage Solutions. We want to hear from you. We have a tool called Disqus to tell us which stories get the most comments each week. Every Friday, the team picks the most thoughtful or opinionated contributions from our readers to enjoy again. Don’t forget to share your favourite stories from the site on social media to keep the conversation going.
  • Richard Beardshaw, head of sales, mortgage intermediaries at HSBC UK for Intermediaries welcoming the brokers to to… https://t.co/897XNMpbFi
  • We are in Allianz Park today for the first in the series of HSBC UK for Intermediaries Breakfast Seminars https://t.co/7rZZDSqmSM
  • At this year’s Later Life Lending Event Richard Rowntree from Bank of Ireland for Intermediaries will be presenting… https://t.co/izCPwrsOYw
Read previous post:
United Trust Bank targets North of England with development finance expansion

United Trust Bank (UTB) has appointed Phil Bird and Evan Griffin as property development managers, joining its development finance division...

Close