Valuations wise, there has clearly some been some unexpected increases through the stamp duty holiday due to finish at the end of March.
Whatever way you look at this scheme, it has contributed to the fuelling of a housing market in a time of economic crisis.
At the same time there has been a growing number of people wanting to move, to a house more conducive to working from home and with outside space available.
Unless Rishi Sunak does make a dramatic U-turn on a drop-dead end date of the scheme, as has been rumoured this weekend, we are going to find ourselves on the edge of a potential housing precipice.
This will lead to uncompleted transactions, with many partners to the house purchase supply chain having to try and pick up the pieces on, ironically, April 1.
Triggered house price crash
The more mature readership will remember a similar situation stoking the house valuation furnaces which was the end of the dual Mortgage Interest Relief At Source (MIRAS) scheme in the late 80s.
Although the scheme was fully wound up in April 2000 by Gordon Brown, Nigel Lawson announced the end of the scheme in his 1988 budget and gave couples a deadline by which to purchase houses and gain £60,000 tax relief on their mortgages.
Sometime later, Lawson publicly stated he regretted not ending the scheme on the day of the budget, and that giving people a future deadline to gain the benefit, caused an unsustainable and artificial increase in house prices.
This led to a house price crash once the benefit was withdrawn and was a trigger for the economic crash of the early 90s.
It is highly probable that prices will drop from 1 April whether the stamp duty holiday is withdrawn with immediate effect or if it gets phased out.
The only difference in these scenarios will be the severity and speed of the drop, and therefore the market’s recovery may have to be criteria and product driven.
Risky business
From a risk perspective we should add two other factors.
The first is the number of lenders bringing out higher loan to value (LTV) products when we do not know the extent of any movement in house prices.
The second is general economic indicators. Today unemployment stands at five per cent or 2.6 million, with the lowly paid and the 25 to 34-year-old segment of the population being hardest hit.
This figure does not include the 4.5 million people still on furlough, and that scheme cannot continue forever.
Looking further afield, in Europe, mortgage book performance is suffering, and for the portfolio purchasers, nonperforming loan (NPL) trades are becoming available at much lower rates than last year.
Following the global finance crisis, in the UK there were clear examples of trades that indicated it was cheaper to buy books than originate new loans. This scenario could potentially re-occur.
Many indicators show we are heading for much higher unemployment than we have today. The Bank of England wants stress scenarios worked with unemployment rising by 12 per cent.
This would be coupled with some level of house valuation correction following the end of the stamp duty exemption.
This can only lead to higher arrears levels and without the regulator’s intervention on forbearance policies, you’d expect much higher repossession rates.
These may well still happen in time anyway, and if it does, will affect property valuations again for obvious reasons.
The rollout of the Covid-19 vaccine will undoubtedly get things moving in the right way, but realistically we’ll be well into Q2 before any resemblance of normality can return, and therefore well into the second half of the year before we can see what life will look like for us all moving forward.
